Talk:FAQ: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Dead bug tracker link== | |||
The link "report" is dead in http://www.coreboot.org/FAQ#How_can_I_help_with_coreboot.3F "Test coreboot, report any bugs you find, or let us know about any suggestions for improvements you have." --[[User:Beloved|Beloved]] ([[User talk:Beloved|talk]]) 15:07, 17 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
"note: the bug tracker is dead. more or less." - http://www.coreboot.org/Development_Guidelines#Bug-Tracker. --[[User:Beloved|Beloved]] ([[User talk:Beloved|talk]]) 15:13, 17 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
==Other== | |||
Ok, as of now, the original page has been wikiized and looks sane inside the wiki. I'm going to move on, but I left some notes that start with '(jdarby:' in a few places where information is lacking or links should be present -- I am sure I did not find all the spots, just a few. I changed the formatting of a few areas slightly, but hopefully its now more readable. --[[User:Jdarby|jdarby]] 21:25, 1 Mar 2005 (CET) | Ok, as of now, the original page has been wikiized and looks sane inside the wiki. I'm going to move on, but I left some notes that start with '(jdarby:' in a few places where information is lacking or links should be present -- I am sure I did not find all the spots, just a few. I changed the formatting of a few areas slightly, but hopefully its now more readable. --[[User:Jdarby|jdarby]] 21:25, 1 Mar 2005 (CET) | ||
Note for the future: This page should be re-organized and the motherboard/chipset specific information should be seperated from the rest into smaller subsections. The information in the e-mails should also be cited and reformed into a more general purpose document instead of quoted text (like the testbios faq), but I don't know enough about what the contents are describing to do so. --[[User:Jdarby|jdarby]] 21:45, 1 Mar 2005 (CET) | Note for the future: This page should be re-organized and the motherboard/chipset specific information should be seperated from the rest into smaller subsections. The information in the e-mails should also be cited and reformed into a more general purpose document instead of quoted text (like the testbios faq), but I don't know enough about what the contents are describing to do so. --[[User:Jdarby|jdarby]] 21:45, 1 Mar 2005 (CET) | ||
---- | |||
the willem programmer at 35 is a real bargain. comes with plcc32 already at much lower cost than that commercial stuff at ebay with zilch support and type updates. Once the PALAICE is operational, that is the clearly preferred choice for developing. But for a long time, burning EPROMs was a real misery before Willem dropped to its current cost level. | |||
Latest revision as of 15:13, 17 January 2015
Dead bug tracker link
The link "report" is dead in http://www.coreboot.org/FAQ#How_can_I_help_with_coreboot.3F "Test coreboot, report any bugs you find, or let us know about any suggestions for improvements you have." --Beloved (talk) 15:07, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
"note: the bug tracker is dead. more or less." - http://www.coreboot.org/Development_Guidelines#Bug-Tracker. --Beloved (talk) 15:13, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Other
Ok, as of now, the original page has been wikiized and looks sane inside the wiki. I'm going to move on, but I left some notes that start with '(jdarby:' in a few places where information is lacking or links should be present -- I am sure I did not find all the spots, just a few. I changed the formatting of a few areas slightly, but hopefully its now more readable. --jdarby 21:25, 1 Mar 2005 (CET)
Note for the future: This page should be re-organized and the motherboard/chipset specific information should be seperated from the rest into smaller subsections. The information in the e-mails should also be cited and reformed into a more general purpose document instead of quoted text (like the testbios faq), but I don't know enough about what the contents are describing to do so. --jdarby 21:45, 1 Mar 2005 (CET)
the willem programmer at 35 is a real bargain. comes with plcc32 already at much lower cost than that commercial stuff at ebay with zilch support and type updates. Once the PALAICE is operational, that is the clearly preferred choice for developing. But for a long time, burning EPROMs was a real misery before Willem dropped to its current cost level.